Comparing several sites? Rank them against the same yardstick.
Franchise development managers, multi-outlet operators, and property and leasing teams evaluating candidate locations need side-by-side answers, not a stack of separate PDFs. This is how we work with teams.
Multi-site comparison
For a portfolio of candidate sites — from a handful to dozens a year — we prepare each location against the same concept, so you can rank candidates on a consistent, explainable score rather than gut feel. Delivery is a ranked comparison with each site's scorecard underneath.
A custom engagement — tell us your candidate list and we'll scope it to your portfolio.
Recurring reporting
If your team evaluates candidate sites on an ongoing basis, we can agree a recurring arrangement so every new location is screened against the same methodology before it reaches the lease decision.
A good first step is one scored report for a site your team already knows well — so you can judge the output against your own experience.
Data and API access
For market-research consultancies and technical teams that want location scores embedded in their own deliverables, we offer programmatic access to the scoring layer. Talk to us about your data needs, volume and licensing.
Enquiry-only for now — we'll scope an arrangement around what you actually need.
Tell us what you're evaluating.
Send the candidate sites and the concept you have in mind. We'll come back with a scoped proposal.
Talk to us